According
to Wright “.the life of a leader is a way of life which Paul expects outsiders
to acknowledge as worthy. Many non-Christians will recognize when someone is
living with integrity proper to faith in the living God.” (Wright, 25, 2009)The
Ephesians church had been blessed with exception leadership and even though it
existed in age where idolatry was the social problem compared to corruption,
immorality and decaying to values happening in the 21st century.
When
it became apparent that Paul had to depart to focus on other ministry commitments
he gave the responsibility over to Timothy, whom he has mentored and seen him
grow to become an effective agent of change for the church and kingdom. Timothy
was to set up system and structure for leadership and define the church
engagement in a culture of idolatry and immorality as the custom of Ephesus. It
must stand out as an emissary of Christ.
The
leaders must rise up the standard of the church in the world amidst contemporary
challenges. And this was the same during the time of Timothy and Paul in the
city of Ephesus and According to Wiersebe “…the Ephesus would not be the
easiest place to pastor church the city was devoted to the worship of Diana,
the patroness of the sexual instinct. Paul had done great work during his three
year ministry in Ephesus (Wiersbe, 13, 1988). It needs men of high caliber who
cannot be corrupted and contaminated with these values and systems that were
infiltrated with idol worship and other vices. Paul focus on the office and
office bearers in the church
The need to determine character in church leadership (I Tim. 3:1-2)
In the world today, we see organizations and corporate bodies establishing up mechanism and structure to evaluate and credit the character of its leadership. The church should not be left out and its commitment to Bible as the best manual for character review and endorsement should be embraced with all vigor. Paul does commend the position and the holder of the position, which he considers worth of respect and honor.
In the world today, we see organizations and corporate bodies establishing up mechanism and structure to evaluate and credit the character of its leadership. The church should not be left out and its commitment to Bible as the best manual for character review and endorsement should be embraced with all vigor. Paul does commend the position and the holder of the position, which he considers worth of respect and honor.
There work is of high value as they represent God
in a world characterized by contradicting values system, rationalism and
post-modernism coupled corrupt and diminishing in societal values. According to
Wieserbe, apostle Paul “emphasized on the character and the work of the
minister…” (Wiersbe, 1988:97). Hence there character has direct influence to
how they work; treat others, and how they serve the church of Jesus Christ.
An evaluation is should be focused on the growth
and usefulness of the leader moral and ethical lifestyle in relation to his
work in the Church. According to Stott “the health of the church depends very
largely on the quality, faithfulness and teaching of its ordained ministers.” (Stott,
1996:89).
The
character qualifications for bishops and pastors in the church. (2-7)
According to Stott the bishops are
also known as oversees and are practically involved in key issues pertaining
the church such as leadership, provide oversight.( Stott, 1996:90)All
professions require competence in their areas. And the same work even in church
need men who are up to the task. And as Andria quoted by Adeyemo affirm that
there are “personal characteristic that fits pastors for their task” (Adeyemo, 2006:1489).
Their roles in the church is not for the faint hearted or those who are seeking
personal gains at the expense of the Church
Therefore if a man desires to be
employed for God’s service- they do desire something with dignity and respect.
The ministry of shepherding the people of God is one that its high status
necessitates for men and women who are cream. Those either elected must give up
themselves and take up the cross and follow Jesus. Unfortunately today in our
churches around the world we lack such requirement and this in turn has
distorted the office and position of leadership in the church.
Hence they must be men who exemplify
high moral standard. They must prove to be of above reproach. This means that
his standing in the public should not be found wanting or doubting in
whatsoever capacity. Wiersbe implies that “there must be nothing in his life
that Satan or the unsaved can take hold off to criticize or attack the church.
No man is sinless but we must strive to be blameless” (Wiersbe, 1988:38). He
does his best when he is found worthy of his office.
This need to be reflected in how the
bishop or pastor manages his family. He must be husband of one wife. This is
loosely translated to indicate that the bishop or pastor must not be divorcee
or remarried. But this should not misconstrue to apply to members, but rather
to pastors or elders. This prohibits a leader from even having external affairs
beyond the marriages. This standard does apply not just to leaders but even to ordinary
members within the church of God.
The overseer must be temperate. They
should free themselves from any addiction to alcoholic beverages that might
interfere with the functionality of their office in providing service to the
church.
This implies the ability of the
leader to be both respectful and self-control in all their dealings. According to Stott this “self mastery is an
indispensable quality of Christian leader” (Stott, 1996:95) more so in an age
where everything is readily available as result of advancement in technological
world. They must exercise high caution while handling there private and public
lives unless they brings shame to the office which they took.
Hospitality is very important
component of Christian, the bible is full of examples of such acts where the
church provided food, accommodation and complete to those in need. A good
example is that of Good Samaritan who helped a wounded man (Luke 10; 25-37) .Hospitality
is something that Jesus in his sermons called to the attention of his followers.
(Matthew 25; 35-40)
In their work to the church the
ability of teaching is of great important. They must have grasped the doctrines
and with unequivalent passion transmits those tenets to the church. As Guthrie
affirms “it was of the utmost importance that the teaching of the church should
be entrusted to capable people and for this reason the bishops are to be apt to
teach. Only so could the doctrine of the church could be maintained…” (Guthrie,
1968:214). They must have been taught with diligence. Paul must have laid the
foundation of knowledge both practical and wisdom for timothy and Titus.
They need to enlighten and equip the body of
Christ with necessary information. According to Wright “the teaching of the
gospel itself and of the way of life which flows from it, must not be muddled,
rambling. It must go straight to the point. So that Christians who need
building up in their faith may learn the deep, rich and basic elements of
Christian teaching” (Wright, 2009:5)
They must watch their drinking habit
unless it becomes bottleneck in performance of their duties. Across the world
people have varying ideas and opinion on alcohol. In Africa it’s an important
element of ceremonies. Hence pastors and bishops should not give themselves into
too much alcohol. In Africa moderation or complete abstaining from drinking
should be encourage.
The dynamicity of culture is
highlighted very well by Wiersebe who alludes that “there is a vast difference
between the cultural use of wine in Bible days and supporting the alcohol
industry of today” (Wiersbe, 1988:40). Therefore
minister is it bishop or pastor must not allow any opportunity for his
reputation to be doubted and with all cautiousness’ they must be sober,
temperate and moderate in their engagement within and outside the church.
They should focus on their family
and home. They ought to be examples of what it does look to be a Christian home
and family where God is the head of the family. In brief Stott has outlined the
areas such as fidelity in marriage, self-mastery, hospitality, teaching
ability, drinking habits, temper and temperament. Attitude to money, domestic
discipline, spiritual maturity and outside reputation of a bishop must exhibit
a character that conforms to Christ, whom we proclaim to be savior and Lord(
Stott, 1996:92-97) These should be
examples worth emulation by the public be it critic and admirers.
The
character qualifications of deacons and their wives in church leadership.
(8-13)
In the service to our savior we
should not be obsessed with position, but rather be consumed by the ultimate
purpose of the position God has put you into be it deaconess or bishopric or
pastoral. As per the establishment of the church our savior dispersed gifts According
to Stott “their rights to see deacons as the assistants of overseers who
operates as an agent and called to lowly and subordinate role.” (Stott, 1996:91).
Whether you are just an ordinary
church member, someone teaching Sunday school, a woman praying or even a guard
with the church compound, it’s the attitude that you demonstrate in whatever
position that matters, Ngewa as quoted by Adeyemo contrast the concept of
servant hood when he asserts that “the concept of service to all, especially to
those who are socially beneath one is foreign to Africa. A chief serving his
master his subjects would be unheard of. Yet that is what Jesus is asking us to
do here” ( Adeyemo, 2006:1308)
Throughout the history of the church
in New Testament we recognize charity and distribution of food as the main
service which the deacons were to offer themselves. Having proved themselves
trustworthy they were tasked with management of church affairs which requires
certain qualification. As Wiersebe identifies they ought to not to be doubled
tongued, not given too much wine, not greedy or filthy, doctrinally sound,
tested and approved, able to established godly homes, willingness to work,(
Wiersbe, 1988:42-45) These would prepare and equip them to take up roles of
service in the church with diligence and prudence.
They didn’t take up these roles with
contempt, but rather drew strength and courage from Jesus Christ our savior who
calls all of us first and foremost to become servants. He washed the feet’s of
his disciples.(John 13) According to Ngewa quoted by Adeyemo “washing feet was
such a menial job that no teacher would expect his disciples to do” ( Adeyemo, 2006:1306).
He provided an example worth emulating not only by deacons but also for
generations.
With the seriousness of this work,
the deacons must be men and women of diligent, courage, and being wise and
judicious in there practical affairs. Ngewa further alludes that all who will
come to Christ work be at whatsoever position must meet the standard when he
affirms that “ a chain of service is thus set up from God to Jesus to Jesus’
disciples to those who will listen to their message and in turn proclaim it to
others” ( Adeyemo, 2006:1308)
The
ultimate purpose for writing on church and its leadership (14-16)
The church is the house of God. His
presence is the church and thus it matters to him how its custodian are
conducting the business there. The church holds forth the Scripture and the
doctrine of Christ, as a pillar holds forth a proclamation. And therefore as
Fee affirms “the church must give heed to what Paul has written because its
alone has been entrusted with the truth…” (Fee, 1988:91) When a church ceases
to be the pillar and ground of truth, to be the compass of moral and ethical,
it does so in its own peril and we should all forsake such type of the church.
The importance of the church in the
world cannot be ignored. It’s the mouth piece of God, representative of Christ
and ambassador of the hope and truth embalmed in our Lord and savior cannot.
How it operates have direct implications to how its call to salvation is
received and processed. It is the bearer of God’s grace, God’s word and God’s
redemptive plan in the world
With this urgency those called to
serve must exhibit commitment to provide and offer themselves, their character,
there service to the house of God established in the world. And as Guthrie
affirms “. The requirements for deacons are similar to those for bishops. In
both cases the chosen men must have proved themselves in their own homes to be
capable of a assuming responsibility.” (Guthrie, 1968:239). The standards are
set high-but attainable and realistic.
Those who are called must show
humility and teachable spirit. And above all others requirement their
understanding of the mission and vision of the Church in the world bears
significance to our communication of gospel, calling sinners to repentance, discipline
the believer in word, equipping them for life-long service to the church and
commissioning them to spread out in the world and make disciples of all
nations.
The church is the custodian of the
truths of God as revealed in the Bible. Hence the ultimate goal of all
ministers regardless of their positions is to guide and point people toward the
truth of God. According to Adrian quoted by Adeyemo affirms that “these truths
must be proclaimed and guarded by the church, which in itself is the pillar and
foundation of the truth.” ( Adeyemo, 2006:1489)
In conclusion and with reference to
Africa contexts we should put emphasis on the need to develop character for
those in positions of leadership and governance structure of the church. Their
mission, visions, values and virtues should be aligned within the context of
the timeless truth as revealed in the word through the person of Jesus. They
must be a mirror in a Africa and beyond.
Unfortunately there is too much of
double standard in the church today. Every single day won’t end without a
mention of pastors and churches leaders involved in practices which ashamed the
principles and values of Christianity. There is moral decaying in within the
ecclesia systems. Hence the need to clean and restore the moral and values of
effective leadership.
When they model transformational
traits of a leader, they would be readily available to provide leadership even
beyond the church. As the founders and those steering the wheel of leadership
and governance for religious bodies, it of great importance that there conduct
collectively give evidence of what the church reflects to society.
They should not forget the mandate
of the church. The leaders should avoid falling into the financial traps; they
should rise and present much need leaders of integrity for societal
transformation. The church has purpose and plan. Its focus is to bear witness
of the person and work of Christ, his victory over death and sin, his
glorification in the presence of God and his ultimate provision which is
salvation, a concept that remains mysterious and phenomenal in our modern world.
If the church doesn’t exhibit these cardinals
truth-then its mission and purpose has been compromised. These characteristic
outlined in 1 Timothy 3;1-17 are useful and practical for long-term vitality of
the church development and growth in its commitment to its mission and purpose
in the in Africa and the world. Those who exhibit are rare but not out of
reach.
Apostle Peter does understand view the
character and mission of the church as intertwined, He does call us to “be
shepherd of God’s flock that is under your care, watching over them- not
because you must, but because you are willing as God, wants you to be; not
pursuing dishonest gain, but eager to serve “for we are “created in Christ
Jesus to do good works” whether we are bishops, pastors, evangelist, elders,
believer or just ordinary follower of Jesus.